I know, this is an unfair comparison. I admit that, but it's what I am looking at as of know. Could change tomorrow :-)

Let's use MSRP for this discussion, forget back room deals for now. Also, automatic transmission models being considered.

2013 Kia Rio SX ($17,900) with Premium package ($2,350) and EC mirror w/Homelink & compass ($295). Including destination ($750) the MSRP is $21,295.

2013 Hyundai Elantra GT ($19,395) with GT A/T Style Package ($2,750), GT A/T Technology Package ($2,350) and Auto-Dimming Mirror with Homelink ($250). Inslucing destination ($775) the MSRP is $25,520.

2 different cars, both loaded. $25,520 vs. $21,295. $4,225 as well as the tax associated with the additional cost, about 8.6%, so we'll say another $360. That brings a total difference of $4,585.

I acknowledge that the Elantra might be "more" of a car, but is it $4,585 more of a car? Build quality, Kia vs. Hyundai? I know what you will be saying, Hyundai owns Kia, so there might be no difference.

I guess I'm looking for opinions. Please comment away :-)

 

In my opinion, no comparison: Elantra GT.

The Rio is equlivant to an Accent, not the Elantra. The Kia Forte equates to the Elantra.

 

But that is not the question that I posed. I acknowledged that I am comparing 2 different classes of cars, the question is the money difference. Is the bigger class of car worth $4,500 more.

 

Yes...

 

That seems to be the general consensus, of course a test drive of both will yield the same conclusion. Thanks :-)

 

My fully loaded Elantra SE (with sunroof) and everything but a nav system only cost $17,500. Yes its a late 2009 model, but I did not pay anywhere near the sticker price. Best do some shoppint around.

Yes, the elantra is far superior over the Kia Reo in ride alone.