Hyundai Sonata reliability

Hyundai Forum Hyundai Classifieds Photo Gallery Member List Calendars Search Contact HF Sponsors
Hyundai Lineup Hyundai News Hyundai Recalls TSBs Timeslips Register Login

Hyundai Sonata reliability

Printable Version

Hyundai >> Vehicle Line Up >> Hyundai Sonata >> Hyundai Sonata reliability

Page: [1]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

Hyundai Sonata reliability - 4/17/2008 9:19:23 AM

mkaresh

Posts: 22
Joined: 1/31/2008
Status: offline

Because existing sources of auto reliability information left much to be desired, in late 2005 I started conducting my own reliability research at TrueDelta.com. TrueDelta reports absolute stats like "trips to the shop" that make the differences between cars much clearer. Results are updated four times a year, so any significant changes in a model's reliability become apparent quickly.

With the Sonata, we've had excellent participation by owners of the 2007 and especially the 2006. Very much need more participants for other years. I'd especially like to provide quick results on the 2009.

Participants simply report repairs the month after they occur on a one-page survey. When there are no repairs, they simply report an approximate odometer reading four times a year, at the end of each quarter.

To encourage participation, panel members receive full access to the results for free.

For the details, and to sign up to help out:

_____________________________

TrueDelta.com
Vehicle reliability, fuel economy, and price comparison information

Post #: 1

RE: Hyundai Sonata reliability - 5/15/2008 6:36:47 AM

mkaresh

Posts: 22
Joined: 1/31/2008
Status: offline

Latest results just posted. The 2006 and 2007 continue to require few repairs.

No results for other years yet because too few owners have signed up to partipate. I'd like to have more years in future results.

To help make this happen for your year:

Vehicle reliability research

_____________________________

TrueDelta.com
Vehicle reliability, fuel economy, and price comparison information

(in reply to mkaresh)

Post #: 2